Cancelling a Riester Rente: What You Lose
Cancelling a Riester Rente counts as schädliche Verwendung and triggers repayment of Zulagen, tax benefits, and taxed growth. See the worked euro cost against three penalty-free alternatives.

You've decided the Riester contract isn't worth it anymore and you're about to call the provider and cancel it outright. Before you do: cancellation is the single most expensive way to exit a Riester Rente, and the fastest option is not the cheapest one.
TL;DR
- Cancelling (kündigen) a Riester Rente counts as "schädliche Verwendung" — harmful use — and triggers repayment of every Grundzulage, Kinderzulage, and tax benefit you've received.
- The Deutsche Rentenversicherung reported an average repayment of roughly €2,500 per cancelled contract in the first half of 2025, and longer-held contracts can owe far more.
- The ZfA (Zentrale Zulagenstelle für Altersvorsorge) can claw back subsidies retroactively for up to 4 years.
- Three exits — Beitragsfreistellung, an Anbieterwechsel, and Wohn-Riester conversion — avoid the clawback entirely and are usually the better move.
- The 2027 Altersvorsorgedepot reform is not a reason to rush: cancelling your Riester contract early does not get you into the new product any faster.
KEY-STAT: €2,500 — average Riester repayment per cancelled contract, H1 2025, per the Deutsche Rentenversicherung figures reported by gegen-hartz.de
Why Cancelling Counts as "Schädliche Verwendung"
German law treats a handful of actions on a Riester contract as schädliche Verwendung — harmful use — because they take the money out of the retirement-savings purpose the subsidy was granted for. Cancelling the contract and taking the payout is the clearest case, alongside withdrawing capital for something other than owner-occupied property, moving the balance into a non-certified product, or permanently relocating outside the EU. The government-backed Deutsche Rentenversicherung explainer is explicit that the responsible body, the Zentrale Zulagenstelle für Altersvorsorge (ZfA), can issue a retroactive repayment demand covering up to four years of subsidies once it identifies a harmful withdrawal.
Warning
The ZfA clawback isn't limited to the year you cancel. It can reach back and reclaim Zulagen paid out in the three prior years as well — a contract you assumed was "already banked" is not safe from repayment until the money has actually left the ZfA's reach.
The Three Things You Forfeit
A Riester cancellation unwinds three separate layers of the subsidy, not just one:
- The Grundzulage and Kinderzulage. Every euro of the annual base subsidy and any child subsidy credited to the contract is deducted from the payout before you see it.
- The tax benefit. Contributions you deducted as Sonderausgaben under §10a EStG get reversed — the Finanzamt effectively un-does the tax saving you already banked.
- Tax on the growth. Any gains and value increases inside the contract lose the tax treatment a retirement product normally gets and are instead taxed in full as sonstige Einkünfte (miscellaneous income) at your regular income tax rate, per the same Deutsche Rentenversicherung breakdown.
None of this touches your original net contributions — those come back. It's everything the state added, plus the tax advantage, plus the growth's favourable tax status, that disappears.
Worked Example: A 15-Year Contract
To make this concrete, here's what the repayment layers look like on a contract that's been running for 15 years, using the DRV's reported average as the anchor and the higher range gegen-hartz.de cites for longer-held contracts:
| Repayment layer | Typical H1 2025 average (per DRV) | Longer-held contract (15 yrs+) |
|---|---|---|
| Grundzulage + Kinderzulage repaid | ~€1,750 | Scales with years held — can exceed €5,000 |
| Sonderausgabenabzug tax benefit reversed | ~€750 | Scales with contribution + tax rate history |
| Total typically clawed back | ~€2,500 | €5,000–€10,000 |
| Additional: growth taxed as sonstige Einkünfte | Varies by fund performance | Varies by fund performance |
This is illustrative, not a quote for your specific contract — your own repayment depends on how many years you've held it, how many Zulagen you actually claimed, and your marginal tax rate in each of those years. The direction is the same in every case: the longer the contract has run, the more expensive cancelling becomes, because more years of subsidy are sitting there waiting to be reclaimed.
Note
Stornokosten — the insurer's own cancellation and administration fees — come out of what's left after the ZfA clawback, and are separate from it. Check your Vertragsunterlagen (policy documents) for the exact Rückkaufswert (surrender value) before assuming the clawback is the only cost.
Three Ways to Exit Without the Penalty
None of the following trigger schädliche Verwendung, according to the same DRV-backed guidance and Raisin's explainer on letting a contract rest:
| Option | What happens | What you keep | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beitragsfreistellung (ruhen lassen) | Stop paying in; the contract stays open | All Zulagen and tax benefits already received; existing balance keeps earning | You want to stop the outflow now but aren't sure about the long term |
| Anbieterwechsel | Transfer the balance to a different Riester-certified provider | Everything — no clawback on a certified-to-certified transfer | You dislike the current provider's fees or fund choice, not Riester itself |
| Wohn-Riester conversion | Redirect the balance toward buying owner-occupied property | Everything, repurposed toward the home instead of a pension payout | You're buying a home and want the balance to count toward it |
Tip
Beitragsfreistellung is reversible — you can resume contributions later if your finances change, so it's the lowest-risk default when you're unsure rather than certain you want out entirely.
When Cancelling Anyway Makes Sense
Two situations make an outright cancellation more defensible: a very small balance that already qualifies for a Kleinbetragsrente lump-sum payout at retirement (where the ordinary annuity requirement is waived), or a genuinely permanent move outside the EU, where Beitragsfreistellung on a German-registered contract stops being practical to manage. Outside of those, this generally suits people who have already compared the three penalty-free routes above and confirmed none of them fit their situation — not a default response to "Riester feels outdated."
How This Fits the 2027 Reform
The 2027 Altersvorsorgedepot replacing Riester for new contracts is a separate question from whether to keep, freeze, or cancel an existing one — covered in full in our Riester decision guide and the broader private-pensions overview. Cancelling early does not grant faster access to the new product or its higher subsidy cap — Bestandsverträge and new Altersvorsorgedepot contracts run on separate tracks, and moving between the two isn't a switch you can execute today. If it's the ETF-based Altersvorsorgedepot itself you're weighing against Riester, that's the comparison that answers it — not the cancellation math on this page.
Comparing Riester-certified providers
Partner link — we may earn a commission; the price for you never changes.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much money do you lose if you cancel a Riester Rente?
The Deutsche Rentenversicherung reported an average repayment of about €2,500 per cancelled contract in the first half of 2025, made up of roughly €1,750 in Zulagen and €750 in reversed tax benefits — contracts held 15 years or longer can owe €5,000–€10,000. The exact figure depends on how many years of subsidies you claimed and your tax rate in each of those years.
Can I get my Riester Zulagen back after cancelling?
No. Once the ZfA has clawed back the Grundzulage, Kinderzulage, and reversed tax benefit as part of a cancellation, that money is gone — it isn't something you can reclaim later, even if you open a new retirement product.
Is Beitragsfreistellung better than kündigen for Riester?
For most people who just want to stop paying in, yes — Beitragsfreistellung keeps every Zulage and tax benefit already received and lets the existing balance keep earning, with no clawback. Kündigung only makes sense once Beitragsfreistellung, an Anbieterwechsel, and Wohn-Riester have all been ruled out.
Does moving abroad force me to cancel my Riester Rente?
Not automatically. Beitragsfreistellung can still apply if you move within the EU. A genuinely permanent move outside the EU is one of the few situations where managing the contract stops being practical, which is why it's one of the narrow cases where cancelling anyway can make sense.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or insurance advice. Compare options via licensed intermediaries such as Check24 or Verivox.
More from Money in Germany

Kfz-Versicherung premiums are up ~10% for 2026. Here's the Nov 30 deadline, the Sonderkündigungsrecht, and how to switch without losing your SF-Klasse.

Germany's 2027 pension reform replaces Riester with the Altersvorsorgedepot, letting savers hold ETFs with an optional (not mandatory) capital guarantee. A worked subsidy table shows a parent of two paying €1,800/year receives €1,140 back in state top-ups.

You started a plain ETF Sparplan - then Riester got scrapped for a state-subsidised ETF pension from 2027. Are you missing free government money? A worked 30-year break-even across a plain ETF Sparplan, Riester, and the new Altersvorsorgedepot shows exactly who each route suits.
Stay in the loop
Get the latest articles delivered to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Tailscale: The Complete Mesh VPN Guide
Search results for Tailscale scatter across install guides, pricing pages, and comparisons with no map between them. This hub ties all six — what it is, WireGuard internals, install, exit nodes, pricing, and Headscale — into one decision path from a homelab that runs it.
Continue Reading